<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pride &amp; Prejudice (2005) &#8211; To Be or Not to Be&#8230; Arrogant?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lightscamerahistory.com/2007/10/22/pride-prejudice-2005-to-be-or-not-to-be-arrogant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lightscamerahistory.com/2007/10/22/pride-prejudice-2005-to-be-or-not-to-be-arrogant/</link>
	<description>All about period dramas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 19:55:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Angela</title>
		<link>http://lightscamerahistory.com/2007/10/22/pride-prejudice-2005-to-be-or-not-to-be-arrogant/comment-page-1/#comment-1709</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 03:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightscamerahistory.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/to-be-or-not-to-be-arrogant/#comment-1709</guid>
		<description>I thought it was a very well done adaptation. I liked MacFadyen’s Darcy and Rosamund Pike was absolutely perfect as Jane, and Tom Hollander&#039;s version of Mr Collins was brilliant. The miniseries is &#039;better&#039; in the sense that because it&#039;s longer and therefore not obliged to leave out characters or plot points because of time constraints, but as a film this one was excellent. 

I think most of the criticism this adaptation has attracted is unwarranted and has to do more with people not liking Keira Knightley (who was good, if not phenomenal as Lizzie) rather than anything actually wrong with the movie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought it was a very well done adaptation. I liked MacFadyen’s Darcy and Rosamund Pike was absolutely perfect as Jane, and Tom Hollander&#8217;s version of Mr Collins was brilliant. The miniseries is &#8216;better&#8217; in the sense that because it&#8217;s longer and therefore not obliged to leave out characters or plot points because of time constraints, but as a film this one was excellent. </p>
<p>I think most of the criticism this adaptation has attracted is unwarranted and has to do more with people not liking Keira Knightley (who was good, if not phenomenal as Lizzie) rather than anything actually wrong with the movie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CenouradoLado</title>
		<link>http://lightscamerahistory.com/2007/10/22/pride-prejudice-2005-to-be-or-not-to-be-arrogant/comment-page-1/#comment-681</link>
		<dc:creator>CenouradoLado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 21:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightscamerahistory.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/to-be-or-not-to-be-arrogant/#comment-681</guid>
		<description>Vi esta versão (que não conhecia) aqui há um mês e este fim de semana resolvi rever a da BCC.
Pronto! Está explicado porque é que nesta versão as mulheres &quot;estão todas de costas&quot;, completamente flats!
;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vi esta versão (que não conhecia) aqui há um mês e este fim de semana resolvi rever a da BCC.<br />
Pronto! Está explicado porque é que nesta versão as mulheres &#8220;estão todas de costas&#8221;, completamente flats!<br />
;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Kerri Mahon</title>
		<link>http://lightscamerahistory.com/2007/10/22/pride-prejudice-2005-to-be-or-not-to-be-arrogant/comment-page-1/#comment-680</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Kerri Mahon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 15:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightscamerahistory.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/to-be-or-not-to-be-arrogant/#comment-680</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t have any problems with the ending although I preferred the ending of the BBC mini-series with them all getting married.  I had a few problems with the rest of the movie, Lady Catherine de Burgh showing up in the middle of the night, the pigs running through the house.  Although the scene in the rain where he proposes was kind of hot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t have any problems with the ending although I preferred the ending of the BBC mini-series with them all getting married.  I had a few problems with the rest of the movie, Lady Catherine de Burgh showing up in the middle of the night, the pigs running through the house.  Although the scene in the rain where he proposes was kind of hot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PA</title>
		<link>http://lightscamerahistory.com/2007/10/22/pride-prejudice-2005-to-be-or-not-to-be-arrogant/comment-page-1/#comment-679</link>
		<dc:creator>PA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 17:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightscamerahistory.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/to-be-or-not-to-be-arrogant/#comment-679</guid>
		<description>I tottaly agree with Xana. The original end was enough for me but it’s always a (not guilty at all) pleasure to have a little peak at the intimate life of the Darcys.
*sigh*
:P PA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tottaly agree with Xana. The original end was enough for me but it’s always a (not guilty at all) pleasure to have a little peak at the intimate life of the Darcys.<br />
*sigh*<br />
:P PA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: witchie</title>
		<link>http://lightscamerahistory.com/2007/10/22/pride-prejudice-2005-to-be-or-not-to-be-arrogant/comment-page-1/#comment-678</link>
		<dc:creator>witchie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightscamerahistory.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/to-be-or-not-to-be-arrogant/#comment-678</guid>
		<description>Well, there&#039;s only one Darcy for me. The true and only ;)
As for Lizzy... I don&#039;t know, but a younger Emma Thompson would be nice. Or Kate Winslet, although she is a bit too smiley. A younger Maggy Smith, perhaps? Tough one, this Lizzy...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, there&#8217;s only one Darcy for me. The true and only ;)<br />
As for Lizzy&#8230; I don&#8217;t know, but a younger Emma Thompson would be nice. Or Kate Winslet, although she is a bit too smiley. A younger Maggy Smith, perhaps? Tough one, this Lizzy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ana</title>
		<link>http://lightscamerahistory.com/2007/10/22/pride-prejudice-2005-to-be-or-not-to-be-arrogant/comment-page-1/#comment-677</link>
		<dc:creator>Ana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 12:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightscamerahistory.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/to-be-or-not-to-be-arrogant/#comment-677</guid>
		<description>Hey Witchie! Who would you like to see playing Lizzy? And Darcy? :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Witchie! Who would you like to see playing Lizzy? And Darcy? :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: witchie</title>
		<link>http://lightscamerahistory.com/2007/10/22/pride-prejudice-2005-to-be-or-not-to-be-arrogant/comment-page-1/#comment-676</link>
		<dc:creator>witchie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 12:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightscamerahistory.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/to-be-or-not-to-be-arrogant/#comment-676</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t see it. I really really don&#039;t like the actress and the idea of one of my all-time favorite heroins being played by her was a big no no for me.
 And the extra scene is criminal! I mean, they have to be allowed certain liberties when making a movie out of a book, but inventing new things really isn&#039;t one of them. Or shouldn&#039;t be.
 So I didn&#039;t see it and I don&#039;t plan on doing it. I refuse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t see it. I really really don&#8217;t like the actress and the idea of one of my all-time favorite heroins being played by her was a big no no for me.<br />
 And the extra scene is criminal! I mean, they have to be allowed certain liberties when making a movie out of a book, but inventing new things really isn&#8217;t one of them. Or shouldn&#8217;t be.<br />
 So I didn&#8217;t see it and I don&#8217;t plan on doing it. I refuse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xana</title>
		<link>http://lightscamerahistory.com/2007/10/22/pride-prejudice-2005-to-be-or-not-to-be-arrogant/comment-page-1/#comment-675</link>
		<dc:creator>Xana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 11:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightscamerahistory.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/to-be-or-not-to-be-arrogant/#comment-675</guid>
		<description>Story goes that the extra scene was made especially for US audiences. It seems that Mr. Bennett was enough for the likes of us European.

And in my humble opinion, it really was. It ends the movie with the ironic, witty tone that’s so famous in Jane Austen.

On the other hand I have to admit that it&#039;s always a (guilty)pleasure to have a little peak at the intimate life of the Darcys :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Story goes that the extra scene was made especially for US audiences. It seems that Mr. Bennett was enough for the likes of us European.</p>
<p>And in my humble opinion, it really was. It ends the movie with the ironic, witty tone that’s so famous in Jane Austen.</p>
<p>On the other hand I have to admit that it&#8217;s always a (guilty)pleasure to have a little peak at the intimate life of the Darcys :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fantasma</title>
		<link>http://lightscamerahistory.com/2007/10/22/pride-prejudice-2005-to-be-or-not-to-be-arrogant/comment-page-1/#comment-674</link>
		<dc:creator>Fantasma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightscamerahistory.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/to-be-or-not-to-be-arrogant/#comment-674</guid>
		<description>Yes, at the movies I like it :P Go figure!!! ;)
(well, just some of it...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, at the movies I like it :P Go figure!!! ;)<br />
(well, just some of it&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://lightscamerahistory.com/2007/10/22/pride-prejudice-2005-to-be-or-not-to-be-arrogant/comment-page-1/#comment-673</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 10:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightscamerahistory.wordpress.com/2007/10/22/to-be-or-not-to-be-arrogant/#comment-673</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not a fan of that extra scene either. For me it doesn&#039;t bring anything to the story, who was already perfect.

Yes, you are right, Ana T. This scene begins when Lizzy, after talking with her father, goes out to tell the news to Darcy. In the french dvd, the american end is in the extras as alternative ending.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a fan of that extra scene either. For me it doesn&#8217;t bring anything to the story, who was already perfect.</p>
<p>Yes, you are right, Ana T. This scene begins when Lizzy, after talking with her father, goes out to tell the news to Darcy. In the french dvd, the american end is in the extras as alternative ending.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
