<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Return to Cranford (2009)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lightscamerahistory.com/2010/01/02/return-to-cranford-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lightscamerahistory.com/2010/01/02/return-to-cranford-2009/</link>
	<description>All about period dramas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 23:28:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela</title>
		<link>http://lightscamerahistory.com/2010/01/02/return-to-cranford-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-4469</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 06:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightscamerahistory.com/?p=3036#comment-4469</guid>
		<description>I adored the 2007 series - Cranford was both well acted and well written, and crucially it captured the spirit of Elizabeth Gaskell&#039;s wonderful writing. When the Christmas special was announced I was excited to see it, and perhaps that&#039;s partially why I was so disappointed with the end result. The 2009 special wasn&#039;t bad, as such, but to me it felt like a soap opera along the lines of Larkrise to Candleford (which is nice enough, I suppose, but I feel it&#039;s a little TOO cheesy) It just isn&#039;t of the same calibre as the 2007 series at all. 

My main complaint with the 2009 special is this: aside from the character of Matilda, the special doesn&#039;t deal with the development of any of the characters that we had been introduced to during the series. Instead, we are presented with a series of new characters who are we are supposed to care about instantly, but who haven&#039;t been given the chance to be developed over time. So I didn&#039;t really care about the story arcs of most of the new characters. It would have been much more interesting to see the development of past characters instead - how Dr Harrison and Sophie cope with married life, how Miss Tomkinson and the butcher deal with it, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I adored the 2007 series &#8211; Cranford was both well acted and well written, and crucially it captured the spirit of Elizabeth Gaskell&#8217;s wonderful writing. When the Christmas special was announced I was excited to see it, and perhaps that&#8217;s partially why I was so disappointed with the end result. The 2009 special wasn&#8217;t bad, as such, but to me it felt like a soap opera along the lines of Larkrise to Candleford (which is nice enough, I suppose, but I feel it&#8217;s a little TOO cheesy) It just isn&#8217;t of the same calibre as the 2007 series at all. </p>
<p>My main complaint with the 2009 special is this: aside from the character of Matilda, the special doesn&#8217;t deal with the development of any of the characters that we had been introduced to during the series. Instead, we are presented with a series of new characters who are we are supposed to care about instantly, but who haven&#8217;t been given the chance to be developed over time. So I didn&#8217;t really care about the story arcs of most of the new characters. It would have been much more interesting to see the development of past characters instead &#8211; how Dr Harrison and Sophie cope with married life, how Miss Tomkinson and the butcher deal with it, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Best of 2009</title>
		<link>http://lightscamerahistory.com/2010/01/02/return-to-cranford-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-4344</link>
		<dc:creator>The Best of 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 06:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightscamerahistory.com/?p=3036#comment-4344</guid>
		<description>[...] Return to Cranford [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Return to Cranford [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cindy</title>
		<link>http://lightscamerahistory.com/2010/01/02/return-to-cranford-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-4077</link>
		<dc:creator>cindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightscamerahistory.com/?p=3036#comment-4077</guid>
		<description>Wonderful adaptation and simply delightful to watch!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderful adaptation and simply delightful to watch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel</title>
		<link>http://lightscamerahistory.com/2010/01/02/return-to-cranford-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-3804</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightscamerahistory.com/?p=3036#comment-3804</guid>
		<description>In case you are wondering, the railway scenes were all filmed at the Foxfield Railway at Blythe Bridge in Staffordshire and I had the pleasure to be the driver for the 5 day shoot. If you want to come and sample the wonderful countryside and visit Hanbury Halt then the railway operates weekends from Easter to October.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case you are wondering, the railway scenes were all filmed at the Foxfield Railway at Blythe Bridge in Staffordshire and I had the pleasure to be the driver for the 5 day shoot. If you want to come and sample the wonderful countryside and visit Hanbury Halt then the railway operates weekends from Easter to October.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anorthite</title>
		<link>http://lightscamerahistory.com/2010/01/02/return-to-cranford-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-3793</link>
		<dc:creator>Anorthite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 16:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightscamerahistory.com/?p=3036#comment-3793</guid>
		<description>Oh, I&#039;m glad you liked it! I look forward to seeing it. Of course, I always want something interesting to happen to Mary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I&#8217;m glad you liked it! I look forward to seeing it. Of course, I always want something interesting to happen to Mary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ana T</title>
		<link>http://lightscamerahistory.com/2010/01/02/return-to-cranford-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-3792</link>
		<dc:creator>Ana T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 14:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightscamerahistory.com/?p=3036#comment-3792</guid>
		<description>To all of you who haven&#039;t watched it yet I hope you enjoy it as much as I did.

Charleybrown, that means that at least for me they ended it with a high note. Speaking of Dr. Harrison did you watch Cranford&#039;s Under The Bonnet? I thought it was really interesting...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To all of you who haven&#8217;t watched it yet I hope you enjoy it as much as I did.</p>
<p>Charleybrown, that means that at least for me they ended it with a high note. Speaking of Dr. Harrison did you watch Cranford&#8217;s Under The Bonnet? I thought it was really interesting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CenouradoLado</title>
		<link>http://lightscamerahistory.com/2010/01/02/return-to-cranford-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-3790</link>
		<dc:creator>CenouradoLado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 02:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightscamerahistory.com/?p=3036#comment-3790</guid>
		<description>Adorei esta série. Agora que me preparo para ver o episódio de Natal acho que vou mas é começar por rever a primeira e, assim, fazer durar o gosto que me dá vê-las.
:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adorei esta série. Agora que me preparo para ver o episódio de Natal acho que vou mas é começar por rever a primeira e, assim, fazer durar o gosto que me dá vê-las.<br />
:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannan</title>
		<link>http://lightscamerahistory.com/2010/01/02/return-to-cranford-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-3789</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 00:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightscamerahistory.com/?p=3036#comment-3789</guid>
		<description>I missed it so now I have to wait for the DVD I thought it was the original Cranford when I saw it in the guide on Direct tv. I am glad you enjoyed it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I missed it so now I have to wait for the DVD I thought it was the original Cranford when I saw it in the guide on Direct tv. I am glad you enjoyed it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charleybrown</title>
		<link>http://lightscamerahistory.com/2010/01/02/return-to-cranford-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-3788</link>
		<dc:creator>Charleybrown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 23:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightscamerahistory.com/?p=3036#comment-3788</guid>
		<description>I did enjoy Return to Cranford but I didn&#039;t feel quite as connected to the characters this time (partly due to the shorter length). I don&#039;t think we&#039;ll be seeing a Cranford 3 though since I believe I read that Heidi Thomas mentioned this would be the last word. IF she did write another one, they would have to bring back Dr. Harrison and Sophy! And of course, I would love to see Dr. Marshland and Mary reunited!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did enjoy Return to Cranford but I didn&#8217;t feel quite as connected to the characters this time (partly due to the shorter length). I don&#8217;t think we&#8217;ll be seeing a Cranford 3 though since I believe I read that Heidi Thomas mentioned this would be the last word. IF she did write another one, they would have to bring back Dr. Harrison and Sophy! And of course, I would love to see Dr. Marshland and Mary reunited!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria Grazia</title>
		<link>http://lightscamerahistory.com/2010/01/02/return-to-cranford-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-3786</link>
		<dc:creator>Maria Grazia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 22:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lightscamerahistory.com/?p=3036#comment-3786</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t wait. Maybe I&#039;ll be able to watch it very soon, who knows?  It looks delicious and I agree with you: why not Cranford 3 ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t wait. Maybe I&#8217;ll be able to watch it very soon, who knows?  It looks delicious and I agree with you: why not Cranford 3 ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
